Programs[ edit ] CMSS is a graduate-level program, currently offering four degrees: Now Faculty of Arts The Masters program is currently completed by thesis, course work or co-op. Masters in Strategic Studies MSS thesis-based is a two-year program consisting of one year of seminar courses, and a second year of thesis writing and defence; whereas, course-based students complete a second year of seminar study.
I was traveling during much of this period. I have waited until now for an opportunity to join the discussion in part for this reason, but mainly for another: In my judgment some of the most important issues concerning the Hiroshima decision cannot be properly addressed without confronting the complexity of the evidence problems involved--and, too, the porous nature of the available record.
I had Military and strategic studies essay informed that detailed discussions of certain aspects of these issues were about to be posted and could thus be referred to in my response. Too often electronic debate becomes bogged down in quotation slinging or-- as some participants in the recent debate openly acknowledge-- moral crusading.
This includes far more detail on certain points than is possible in this response. In addition, the memorandum takes up gross misrepresentations which some participants seem bent on repeating even after their attention has been called to errors of fact.
The memorandum is also available at the above-cited Home Page and e-mail address. The overall goal is to attempt to move beyond increasingly sterile and time-consuming aspects of the current discussion--and to provide sufficient information to researchers, history teachers, and graduate students and undergraduates so that they can make informed judgments on the evidentiary questions for themselves.
Our hope is that the materials will be of particular use to those teaching undergraduate and graduate courses which deal with the issue.
Given the amount of space devoted to postings by various critics, and the amount of material which must be dealt with, the following response has been organized into sections which will appear during a four-day period beginning today.
Part IV takes up certain additional issues involved in the debate. The central issues raised in several postings during last fall's debate--and, indeed, in connection with the Hiroshima bombing in general--are: The tone and argument of some of last fall's postings seemed to indicate that those writing believed it outrageous to suggest the bombings were unnecessary.
Some went so far as to impugn motives and professional integrity, and a level of anger and venom quite unusual in serious scholarly discussion appeared regularly in the postings of one or two participants. Some postings also betrayed a lack of information on the general state of the professional debate.
This was not true of all of the contributions, of course.
Indeed, many raised important and insightful points. To put the central issues in perspective at the outset, however, let me simply note the following: A One of the earliest and most respected students of the issue was Herbert Feis. Not only was Feis an important scholar, but as a former Special Assistant to Secretary of War Stimson and other Cabinet members as wellhe had privileged access to inside information and opinions.
There can hardly be a well-grounded dissent from the conclusion reached by the members of the U. Instead of asking whether the bomb was essential to compel "surrender on our terms within a few months," he now clarified that he meant "before [Japan] was invaded.
However, Feis's judgment on the central issue has for decades helped serious scholars establish some of the lines of legitimate debate and, implicitly, of informed and uninformed criticism as well.Esquire's Mavericks of Style 5 Tom Hardy Saves the Day (No, Really) Understanding Military Strategy and the Four Levels of War.
These are the Political, Strategic, Operational, and. i Calgary Papers in Military and Strategic Studies Canadian Arctic Sovereignty and Security Historical Perspectives Edited by P.
Whitney Lackenbauer. Strategic bombing during World War II was the sustained aerial attack on railways, harbours, cities, workers' housing, and industrial districts in enemy territory during World War II.
Strategic bombing is a military strategy which is distinct from both close air support of ground forces and tactical air power.. During World War II, it was believed by many military strategists of air power that. Reuters explores the strategy behind China's military ambitions, and reveals how U.S.
allies and profit-driven individuals are helping Beijing bypass arms sanctions. Earn a Military Strategic Studies degree at the United States Air Force Academy, a top-ranked university.
The Military Strategic Studies major prepares you to operate and lead responsibly across the spectrum of conflict. Oct 17, · Campus Watch demands academic integrity in North American Middle East studies (MES) programs.
It reviews and critiques MES bias with the aim of improving education – keeping watch on scores of professors at hundreds of universities.