Bush offered an unmistakable denunciation of Trumpism on Thursday without mentioning the president by name, urging citizens to oppose threats to American democracy. But unlike Obama, who campaigned intensely against Trump and has been taking sideways swipes at him since leaving office, Bush has said very little publicly about the current president, or about American politics at all. Thursday's speech, in which he detailed what he sees as the causes for democratic collapse, the path forward and what were obvious references to Trump — even though, like Obama, he did not utter the president's name — was a major departure in a speech that called on a renewal of American spirit and institutions.
Millions, possibly billions, of people have come to believe what is essentially a conspiracy theory, generating fear and misunderstanding about a whole class of technologies on an unprecedentedly global scale.
This matters enormously because these technologies — in particular the various uses of molecular biology to enhance plant breeding potential — are clearly some of our most important tools for addressing food security and future environmental change. This is what has happened with the GMOs food scare in Europe, Africa and many other parts of the world.
Allowing anti-GMO activists to dictate policymaking on biotechnology is like putting homeopaths in charge of the health service, or asking anti-vaccine campaigners to take the lead in eradicating polio.
I believe the time has now come for everyone with a commitment to the primacy of the scientific method and evidence-based policy-making to decisively reject the anti-GMO conspiracy theory and to work together to begin to undo the damage that it has caused over the last decade and a half.
On a personal note, let me explain why I am standing here saying this. Believe me, I would much prefer to live a quieter life. However, following my apology for my former anti-GMO activism at my Oxford speech in January, I have been subject to a co-ordinated campaign of intimidation and hate, mostly via the internet.
Moreover, I have been encouraged by emails and other support from globally-renowned scientists who are experts on this issue, and who all said basically the same thing to me: I think these scientists are the unsung heroes of this saga.
They carried on with their important work and tried year after year to fight against the rising tide of misinformation, while people like me were belittling and undermining them at every turn. Some of them are here today, and I would like to give them my deepest thanks.
So for me also there is also a moral dimension to this. The fact that I helped promote unfounded scare stories in the early stages of the anti-GMO movement in the mid s is the reason why I now feel compelled to speak out against them.
I have a personal responsibility to help put these myths to rest because I was so complicit in initially promoting them. For me, apologising was therefore only the beginning. I am now convinced that many people have died unnecessarily because of mistakes that we in the environmental movement collectively made in promoting anti-GMO fear.
With that on your conscience, saying sorry and then moving on is not enough. Some restitution is in order. Following a decade and a half of scientific and field research, I think we can now say with very high confidence that the key tenets of the anti-GMO case were not just wrong in points of fact but in large parts the precise opposite of the truth.
This is why I use the term conspiracy theory. Populist ideas about conspiracies do not arise spontaneously in a political and historic vacuum. They result when powerful ideological narratives collide with major world events, rare occasions where even a tiny number of dedicated activists can create a lasting change in public consciousness.
More recently, conspiracy theories about reflected the hatred many on the political Left had for the Bush Administration. Successful conspiracy theories can do real damage. In Nigeria an outbreak of Muslim conspiracy theorising against the polio vaccination campaign there led to a renewed polio outbreak which then spread to 20 other countries just when the disease was on the brink of being entirely eradicated.
The result in South Africa was that hundreds of thousands of people were denied life-saving anti-retroviral treatments and died unnecessarily. The anti-GMO campaign has also undoubtedly led to unnecessary deaths.
Thousands died because the President of Zambia believed the lies of western environmental groups that genetically modified corn provided by the World Food Programme was somehow poisonous.
I have yet to hear an apology from any of the responsible Western groups for their role in this humanitarian atrocity. Friends of the Earth was one of those responsible, and I note that not only has no apology been forthcoming, but Friends of the Earth Europe is still actively promoting GMO denialism in the EU in a new campaign called Stop the Crop.
Check out their Youtube video to see how they have learned nothing in ten years. Another well-known example is that of Golden Rice, genetically modified to contain high levels of beta carotene in order to compensate for the vitamin A deficiency which kills hundreds of thousands of children around the world and blinds many more every year.
Here the actions of Greenpeace in forestalling the use of golden rice to address micronutrient deficiencies in children makes them the moral and indeed practical equivalent of the Nigerian mullahs who preached against the polio vaccine — because they were stopping a lifesaving technology solely to flatter their own fanaticism.
I think this campaign is shameful and has brought the entire environmental movement into disrepute, with damaging consequences for the very beneficial work that many environmentalists do. The anti-GMO campaign does not even have the benefit of intellectual coherence. This is like being against all computer software because you object to the dominant position of Microsoft Office.
On a logical basis only a case by case assessment makes sense for deciding how any technology might best be applied. This matters today more than ever because we are entering an age of increasingly threatening ecological scarcity.Essay on A Speech on Bullying Words Sep 2nd, 5 Pages Good Morning/Afternoon fellow class mates, the issue that I have come to share and talk about with you today is Bullying.
The Judge Had Such a Difficult Time On Octover 23rd the 10th annual Sendai Ikuei Gakuen speech contest was held. Seven girl students from the forign language course, four second year students and three first year students took part this year. Vision: I have empathy for all your life struggles.
And I have empathy for the manipulations that you may have endured. But what I do not have compassion or understanding for is the idea that, when you were at your lowest, you chose out of the millions of choices and variables in front of you You chose to overpower me and use my body as a weapon against my friends and my home.
Get expert tips, free printables and fun activities for your child’s learning journey. Bullying can result In physical Injury, social and emotion distress and even death.
Children who have been bullied have an increased risk for mental health problems such as depression and anxiety. Children who suffer physical or emotional bullying are twice as likely to develop psychotic symptoms then children who are not bullied.
"Bullying, a boarding school, and a sweet romance. The Crowd combines the wit of Mean Girls and the sizzling romance of Twilight in a setting that rivals Anna and the French Kiss - all while remaining clean and wholesome." Only the children of millionaires and billionaires attend Whitfield Preparatory Academy.